2026 Primaries

Feb. 21st, 2026 03:46 pm
livingdeb: (Default)
[personal profile] livingdeb
In Texas you can vote in either primary without having to be a party member. However, you may vote in only one party's primaries for the whole year and this disqualifies you from signing petitions for Independents or candidates from other other parties for the rest of the year. Of course in the general election you are not restricted by party.

This year I'll be voting in the Republican primary, to vote against certain Republican incumbents, but I've also gotten information on the Democrat primary so I'll include all that information below, for those of you who are voting for any of the same positions as I am.

Once again, my knowledgeable anonymous friend (who I'll refer to as "my friend") who keeps up with Democrat doings throughout the year has shared knowledge, though that's been a tough job this time. And if you have more information on anyone you'd love to recommend or oppose, I'd love to hear it.

US Senator

James Talarico (Dem) – He has experience in the Texas House and I like his policies. For example, 'Our border should be like a front porch—a giant welcome mat out front and a lock on the door. I'd propose modernizing ports of entry to detect threats before they enter the country, hiring more asylum judges to process cases quickly, stopping ICE abuses so they focus on deporting criminals instead of community members, passing the DREAM Act, and creating clear pathways to citizenship.' And he's made the national news trying to appear on the Colbert Report; the interview can be viewed on YouTube where the emphasis on his Christian background may help him be palatable to decent conservatives. Jasmine Crockett also completed the League of Women Voter's survey, but thinks we should increase the size of the Supreme Court again. I think that's cheating—I'd rather have term limits.

My friend says, 'If you've been reading these messages for any length of time, you'll have seen the profuse enthusiasm I have for James. He's someone I will support no matter what race he's running in, and I'm excited as hell to vote for him for Senator. That said, if you want to vote for Jasmine Crockett, do so. We have two great candidates here, but my vote goes to James.'

Gulrez "Gus" Khan (Rep) – I'd love to vote against incumbent Cornyn, though I like him a lot better than Ken Paxton. Cornyn mostly follows along with whatever Trump and Ted Cruz want; Paxton makes up even more extreme horrors and pressures Governor Abbott to follow along, and then sues everybody doing anything too decent. Khan has some ideas I like (integrity, accountability, transparency, 'a willingness to admit when something isn't working,' reducing some of the problems with health insurance) and some I don't (he loves tariffs and promoting gas and oil).

US Representative, District 37

Greg Casar (Dem) – This newly gerrymandered district includes both my current Rep who I love (Lloyd Doggett) and Casar, so Doggett is retiring. I've liked Casar as my city council member where his focus has always been on the little guy, especially job safety and housing costs. He was considered more to the left of other council members because he wanted to lower housing costs with denser building, including even apartment buildings of three stories, or even five! The horror! He's also an incumbent, and I see no reason to switch to someone else. My friend agrees: 'Greg is a strong candidate that we've watched from his days on Austin City Council, and he's great.'

Lauren Pena (Rep) – This district is gerrymandered for Democrats to win, but I like that Pena seems to have specific ideas rather than just platitudes. For example, In healthcare, she wants to increase price transparency, and prioritize patients and doctors over 'federal middlemen.' She also admits that we do want some immigration and the authorities should treat people humanely.

Texas Governor

Gina Hinajosa (Dem) – My friend says, 'This one's easy. I've known Gina for years, and she's wonderful. Let's put her over the top.' The Austin Chronicle agrees, saying they love everything about her.

Evelyn Brooks (Rep) – I'd love to vote against Greg Abbott who, with any pressure, succumbs to MAGA. And Brooks seems reasonable. She says she 'would limit state cooperation with federal [immigration] enforcement that threatens to take away the Constitutional rights, liberty, and privacy from Texans and state sovereignty. Due process must be given to all within our borders.' She seems pro-life, but prioritizes the woman's life.

Texas Lieutenant Governor

Vikki Goodwin (Dem) – My friend says, 'Four-term legislator in the TX House. Solid choice.'

Timothy Mabry (Rep) – It's great to vote against incumbent Dan Patrick. But I also like some of Mabry's policies. 'I support regulating, not criminalizing cannabis. Industrial, medical uses must be clearly separated. Medical access should allow low-potency products without excessive barriers. Recreational use should be treated like alcohol, with strict age limits and impairment testing. … Water policy must prioritize people, agriculture then business.' And he says he's 'skilled at bringing people with different views together to solve complex problems.'

Texas Attorney General

Nathan Johnson (Dem) – My friend says, 'I hate this race. I love Joe Jaworski, but I also love Nathan Johnson. I'm sad we lost him in the TX Senate, but he's great, and probably stands the best chance in November.'

Joan Huffman (Rep) - Glad to be getting rid of Ken Paxton, but the Republican candidates all look terrible to me. I know Chip Roy is a horror. Aaron Reitz certainly looks like one in his answers to the League of Women Voters. The others didn't bother to respond. Per https://texasscorecard.com/state/texas-attorney-general-candidates-spar-during-heated-debate/, Middleton and Reitz want to be seen as MAGA, and they still all seem horrible. 'Huffman later came under fire for her response to Reitz and Middleton’s intent to remove the “rogue” Democrat district attorneys in Dallas, Harris, and Travis counties from office for violating their oaths of office by refusing to prosecute crime.

Huffman implied that such an action “cannot be done on day one … or in the first month. It is a process.” She proceeded to point out that the “vast majority of the prosecutors in this state are great people” who have their constituents’ “best interests at heart.” ' So she gets my vote for not acting like a dictator.

Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

Sarah Eckhardt (Dem) – My friend says, 'Another easy one. Sarah is a great person, and a great candidate. I'd love to see her serve statewide.' The Austin Chronicle agrees. I also heard some good things about her during an unrelated candidate forum.

Kelly Hancock (Rep) – I don't like any of the Republicans running, and normally I wouldn't choose someone endorsed by Greg Abbott, but Huffines is a horror (and endorsed by both Ted Cruz and Chip Roy, both worse than Abbott). It looks like we have a choice between pro-insurance bias, pro-oil bias, or pro-real estate bias. I'm choosing Hancock for being 'one of two GOP state senators who voted in favor of convicting Attorney General Ken Paxton on impeachment changes.' I got my information from https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/texas-gop-comptroller-primary-don-huffines/.

Texas Commissioner of the General Land Office

Benjamin Flores (Dem) – From Ballotpedia, Flores explains that 'The Texas General Land Office generates revenue from state lands that flows into the Permanent School Fund,' so he wants to 'make sure we're getting maximum value from every lease and every acre. That means embracing innovation, welcoming renewable energy producers alongside oil and gas, and running tighter operations.' He also says, 'The federal government found that Hurricane Harvey recovery funds were distributed in a discriminatory way. That's a systems failure. Preventing systems failures is what my career [in cybersecurity and risk management] prepared me to do. … Most failures aren't surprises. They're predictable if you're paying attention. I want government to work the same way: transparent, accountable, and focused on preventing problems.'

Dawn Buckingham (Rep) – unopposed

Texas Commissioner of Agriculture

Clayton Tucker (Dem) – unopposed

Nate Sheets (Rep) – Sheets wants to reprioritize state food dollars toward Texas-grown produce and meat,' make it easier for farmers to sell directly to consumers, and 'Instead of subsidizing multi-national processed food companies, I'll use the state's buying power to buy from Texas farmers and ranchers—keeping dollars local.' And you get to vote against the incumbent Sid Miller, a MAGA Republican.

Texas Railroad Commissioner

Jon Rosenthal (Dem) – My friend says, 'Jon Rosenthal is unopposed. Loved him in the TX House, though.'

Hawk Dunlap (Rep) – He calls himself a conservative-libertarian and small government advocate yet is highly critical of the railroad commission’s approach toward regulating the oil and gas industry for being too lax. He wants to charge a tax of 10 cents a barrel for every barrel of oilfield wastewater injected underground commercially, both to increase income and to encourage other uses for that water such as to to cool data centers. (I got my information from https://www.texastribune.org/2026/02/09/texas-railroad-commission-primary-2026-guide-wright-rosenthal/)

Texas Chief Justice, Supreme Court

Maggie Ellis (Dem) – My friend says 'Currently on the 3rd Court of Appeals. Solid.'

Jimmy Blacklock (Rep) – unopposed

Texas Justice, Supreme Court Place 2

The Democrat and Republican candidates are unopposed.

Texas Justice, Supreme Court Place 7

Kristen Hawkins (Dem) – My friend says, 'Kristen Hawkins is a district court judge and will be good on the supreme court.'

Kyle Hawkins (Rep) - unopposed

Texas Justice, Supreme Court Place 8

Gisela Triana (Dem) – unopposed

Brett Busby (Rep) – unopposed

Texas, Judge, Court of Criminal Appeals Place 3, 4, and 9

All three have Democrats running unopposed.

Place 3 – Alison Fox (Rep) – She's the only Republican who responded to the LWV Guide and says she is pro-law, precedent, and Constitution. Reading https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/texas-court-criminal-appeals-primaries-who-running-and-what-know didn't change my mind.

Place 4 – Kevin Patrick Yeary (Rep) – unopposed

Place 9 – Jennifer Balido (Rep) – Based on the article referenced above and their two websites, the other candidate seems more extremist.

Texas Member, State Board of Education District 5

Allison Bush (Dem) – My friend says, 'Works well in conservative majorities, which I like. All of these candidates are really solid, which makes this a tough race to call.'

Mica Arellani (Rep) – unopposed.

Texas House of Representatives District 46

Sheryl Cole (Dem) – unopposed.

My friend has this to say about the other districts in Central Texas:
'HD-19: Javi Andrade. He answered the LWV Voters Guide. His opponent did not, Sometimes that's all it takes for me.
HD-47: Pooja Sethi. Former Travis County Democratic Party Chair, effective Chief of Staff in VIkki Goodwin's office, with loads of legislative experience.
HD-48: Donna Howard is unopposed.
HD-49: Montserrat Garibay. Her experience in Education is important, now that we won't have Gina Hinojosa in that seat.
HD-50: Jeremy Hendricks. Strong labor leader, solid dude.
HD-51: Lulu Flores is unopposed.'

No Republican candidate.

Texas Chief Justice, 15th Court of Appeals District

The Democrat and Republican candidates are unopposed.

Texas Justice, Fifteenth District Court of Appeals, Places 2 and 3

Democrats and Republicans are unopposed.

Texas Chief Justice, Third Court of Appeals District

The Democrat and Republican candidates are unopposed.

Texas District Judge, Judicial districts 147, 201, 250, 261, 299, 331, 403, 419, 455, 459

Democrats are unopposed.

No Republicans are running.

Travis County Judge

Andy Brown (Dem) – unopposed

No Republicans are running.

Travis County Judge, County Court at Law No. 1 – 7

Democrats are unopposed.

No Republicans are running.

Travis County Judge, Probate Court No. 1

Guy Herman (Dem) – unopposed

No Republicans are running.

Travis County District Clerk

Velva L. Price (Dem) - unopposed

No Republicans are running.

Travis County Clerk

Dyana Limon-Mercado (Dem) – unopposed, and she was the choice of the previous County Clerk, who I respected.

No Republicans are running.

Travis County Treasurer

Dolores Ortega Carter (Dem) – unopposed

No Republicans are running.

Travis County Justice of the Peace, Precinct 5

Tanisa Jeffers (Dem) – unopposed

No Republicans are running.

Travis County Party Chair

Doug Greco (Dem) – He's the incumbent and is the choice of both my friend and the Austin Chronicle.

Jennifer Fleck (Rep) - unopposed

Propositions

My friend says, 'Do what you will with the propositions. They aren't laws, they are wish lists from the party that, while lovely, don't do a thing. I almost always vote no on all of them, just because of how annoyed I got fielding calls about it when I was Executive Director of LWV Texas.'

In the first time I looked at these they all looked like they were trying to yank the chains of the other major party; this time they aren't all awful, though many are still unrealistic. I'm voting for 'There should be unicorns.' Just kidding--neither party has that one.

Why Vote?

Feb. 14th, 2026 03:48 pm
livingdeb: (Default)
[personal profile] livingdeb
I'd like to talk about my philosophies of voting. I feel like this is not talked about in school or many places at all, but I've spent a lot of time thinking of these issues and so maybe I'll say something useful. I think I'll organize it by concern.

Warning: I'm pretty left-wing on a lot of issues, but most of what I say applies to anyone who cares about how the country is run; and the rest can be translated into your own values. Plus, even if you disagree with me about everything, I still hope you vote. I want this to be a real democracy (okay, democratic republic) where everyone gets a say.

Complaint: They all stink.

Even if you feel like you're voting for the lesser of two evils, one of them is less evil. One of them will win, there's no getting around that, but you can add your voice for less evil.

Answer: The lesser evil is less evil.

Complaint: No, they're all the same.

They may all be corrupt, but are they corrupt on just one or two issues or on most of the issues? Does their corruption affect a few people or most people? Are the consequences bad or horrifying?

Answer: Don't be a single-issue voter.

As a test-scoring firm I worked for required: look at the preponderance of the evidence. Right now, one party is condoning war crimes in Israel, punishes success with higher taxes, wants to let women kill their own fetuses, and never prioritized the Epstein files when they had the chance. The other party wants to accelerate the climate crisis, encourage epidemics of diseases we have vaccines for, stick large numbers random brown people of all ages into inhumane prisons, twist our democracy into fascism, break our promises to our allies, and start World War III. Look at all your own top issues and look at the preponderance of the evidence to decide which candidates are your overall favorites.

Complaint: I'm a decent conservative.

This is a hard one. Vote in the primaries, either for the most decent Republicans or the most moderate Democrats. Then in the general election, plug your nose and vote for the lesser evil. Because you don't want the greater evil winning.

And then you can still communicate your wishes to whoever wins. You're still their constituent.

Answer: Vote in the primaries.

Complaint: My vote doesn't matter.

No, one vote is not likely to make a difference. On the other hand, your vote counts just as much as anyone else's does.* And if everyone like you decided not to vote, that would make a difference. This is the best way to make your voice heard--your comments and protests can be ignored, but your vote must be counted.

Also, your vote counts a lot more in local elections, and many good national ideas started at the local level.

Edited to add this idea from my brother: voting shows that you don't want your right to vote taken away. And also, voting shows the registrar that you're still in town--not voting through a couple of general elections and then not responding to postcards they send is one way that people get taken off the voting rolls.

Some people say if you don't vote, then you can't complain. (I disagree--we all deserve to complain about bad service and stupid ideas.) Still, you can think of voting as your ticket to comment.

*Okay, your vote does count less if you're voting in a district gerrymandered to concentrate voters expected to vote in one party. Even then, people do also look at the popular vote, so your vote still makes a statement. But if your district is gerrymandered to spread out voters in one party, they may have cut things so close that your vote actually counts more than other people's.

Answer: It matters as much as anyone else's and it shows you still want your right to vote (and gives you the right to complain).

Complaint: I just cannot make myself vote for either major party.

Then vote for your favorite third-party candidate. No, third parties usually don't win, but if they get a high enough percentage of the votes (something still crazy small, like 5%), that still makes a statement, and the winner will often use their best ideas. I think that counts as a win.

I do want to caution against voting for someone way more more extreme than you would actually want to win, just to send a message. Because of things like Brexit. Either vote for the one you most want to win, or the one most likely to beat the one you least want to win.

Answer: Vote for a third-party candidate.

Complaint: Voting takes forever and is no fun.

You probably have more choices than waiting in line after work on election day. My county generally has at least a week of early voting, and it's always dead when I go (admittedly, usually on a weekday). Your employer may have a policy that lets you vote during the work day. You may be able to vote by mail (this is a hassle in Texas, but may be worth it if you're disabled).

But just in case, wear comfy shoes and bring something you can do while waiting in line. I've also been to some small precincts where everyone uses voting day as a time to hang out with their neighbors.

Answer: Consider alternative ways to vote.

Complaint: I'm afraid ICE will grab me.

I want to say that only citizens are allowed to vote, so you will be safe. And no guns are allowed within a certain distance of the polls, so you will be safe. But I've seen the news. As a person who is so white I'm pink, I'm in no position to tell you to vote. Maybe this has to be like vaccines. Some people are too ill to get vaccinated, but so long as most other people do get vaccinated, those people are still protected. All of us who can safely vote should do so.

You may be able to vote by mail if you register to do that early enough. In Texas you need an excuse to vote by mail. If you're not over 65, note that the definition of disability is that you affirm that "I have a sickness or physical condition that prevents me from appearing at the polling place on Election Day without a likelihood of needing personal assistance or injuring my health." If you check this box, that is all the explanation needed. (You could possibly argue that being brown is a physical condition that prevents you from appearing at the polls without a likelihood of injuring your health.)

Another idea is to bring supporters with you.

Another idea, if you have a choice of polling locations, is to go to one where most voters are expected to be Republican; I'd think ICE would focus on the locations expected to have more Democrats.

Answer: Do what you can to stay safe, even if that means not voting; encourage your non-brown friends to vote.

Complaint: I don't know who to vote for.

I'm with you on that one. No one's campaign flyer is going to say how they're only corrupt in one area or that they're a jerk who pisses everyone off. Politicians are also famous for lying on the campaign trail.

So, here are my ideas:
* Do look at their websites to at least see what they're promising. If you disagree with their best side, that's a bad sign.
* Look at The League of Women Voters Guide - they have interviews of candidates and try to list pros and cons of issues.
* Search for news or scandals about candidates.
* Find people who stay informed all year and see who they recommend. Newspapers tend to make recommendations in all the races (or in the primaries, for all the races in their preferred party). Professional and other organizations may make recommendations in their specialties, but these tend to be single-issue recommendations. The best endorsements are like movie reviews--they tell you why they like the person or issue they endorse, so you can see if you agree with their reasoning--they may talk you into voting for someone they don't like or vice versa.

Answer: Look for their stance on issues, what's in the news, and what people-in-the-know recommend.

Edited to add:
Complaint: The elections are rigged.

I've heard several rumors about this. For example:

* Voting machines were hacked - If you have a printed ballot, you can see how the machine thinks you voted. It is standard to choose a few elections in different precincts and compare what's on the printed ballots (hand-counting) with what the machines have counted--so if the printed ballot doesn't match the computer code, that will be caught.

* Non-citizens are voting - That's illegal in all states. It does happen, but only very rarely.

* Sometimes it looks like Republicans are winning, and then at the last second, Democrats win - That's because election-day votes are counted first then early voting and mail-in ballots; Republicans are more likely to vote on election day and Democrats are more likely to vote at other times.

* Mail-in ballots are ripe for fraud - Mail-in ballots must be attached to the names and Voter ID's of registered voters or they are not accepted. If someone tries to vote both in person and through the mail, only the first vote will be accepted unless an in-person voter petitions to destroy their mailed-in ballot.

That doesn't mean hacking isn't a danger; fortunately, it can be resisted. Here are the more likely routes:

* Hack the voter rolls - You can fight this by double-checking to make sure you are registered to vote when there is still time to re-register if necessary. (This also helps you catch other issues, like not having re-registered in a new place you've moved to.)

* Gerrymander - Unfortunately, totally legal. At least this doesn't affect votes for local elections.

* Hack social media - Russians and others have been caught spreading lies in American social media trying to get people angry enough to vote Republican. If something sounds crazy, look for evidence that it's really true before basing any decisions on that information.

* Change voting rules to make it harder for groups of people who are likely to vote for one party. For example, requiring a street address means some Native Americans can't vote. Requiring a passport or birth certificate with a matching name will disqualify many women (and others) who have changed their names and don't travel internationally. Disallowing voting on Sundays affects church buses going to the polls after Sunday services. Letting post offices postmark mail later (this just happens) makes it less likely that mail-in votes will count. Try to keep informed on rules changes and make a plan to deal with them.

Answer: Informed voting is the best way to fight this issue.

Encouraging Candidate Forum

Feb. 14th, 2026 02:04 pm
livingdeb: (Default)
[personal profile] livingdeb
At today's neighborhood association meeting, several Democrats running for state representative in District 50 came to answer questions. (There is also a Republican running, but he is unopposed. I don't know if he was invited.)

It was actually nice. I'm not in District 50 (my part of the neighborhood is south of that district), and I have to say I'm so glad I don't have to choose between those folks. I would be thrilled to have any of the five who showed up win the election. (One Democrat didn't show up, but one of the folks who came said she'd been to over 40 of these types of meetings, and they all knew the other guy, so it's not like he never shows up.)

Every one of them was smart, passionate, caring, and had good ideas. Most or all of them are into the multi-pronged approach of having ideas, looking for commonalities across the aisle, and resisting when they have to. And they were nice to each other!

It's hard to explain just how touching I found all this. Like: our announcer said their names, and they stood up in that order as he said them, then got in line in that order, and then sat down in that order. No jockeying for position, no boring questions about where to sit, just common sense and efficiency. And they all followed the pattern the announcer had started for when it was their turn to answer a question.

Surprisingly, one said, and another confirmed, that Texas has more Democrats registered to vote than Republicans. What? How would you even know? Per https://independentvoterproject.org/voter-stats/tx, they mostly guess based on what primary you vote in. That same source specifies:
Total Registered Voters: 17,485,702
* Democrats: 8,133,683 (46.52%)
* Republicans: 6,601,189 (37.75%)
* Unaffiliated: 2,750,830 (15.73%)
And who even knew that many people voted in primaries?

One of the candidates also said there were Democrats running in every district. They aren't just giving up and not even trying, even in obviously Republican districts.

I don't want to get too hopeful. Beto made it so easy to feel hopeful, and then he lost! Although, as one candidate pointed out, there were a lot of wins lower on the ballot that year with all the judges we have to vote for in this state. And worse: the president, our governor, and the Republican party have all made it clear they will punish any Republicans who vote alongside Democrats, no matter how reasonable the issue. So that makes it extra hard to work out bipartisan compromises.

Still. Y'all, let's vote!

Finland Books

Feb. 13th, 2026 09:36 am
livingdeb: (Default)
[personal profile] livingdeb
In my quest to read books from all the countries, ideally for each country I'd find a good general book, at least one good book on a narrow issue, and at least one fun book, plus learn a bit about the country. I feel like I have succeeded with Finland.

Before starting, I knew that Finland was one of the Scandinavian countries. That's actually wrong (only Norway, Sweden, and Denmark are considered Scandinavian), but it is one of the Nordic countries (along with Iceland and the Scandinavian countries).

Finnish Lessons

Several years ago I read Pasi Sahlberg's Finnish Lessons: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? (2011). Finland found that its students weren't doing well compared to those of other western nations, so they looked up research on good teaching methods. Most of what they found was in the US, but unlike US teachers, they tried out the ideas in schools. Then they continued the research themselves. And they decided their teachers should also be researchers. So now teachers are well-paid and they have post-doctorate (research) degrees and they have ways to mentor each other and otherwise share ideas.

I don't remember the actual changes to teaching except they went with a lot more learning-by-doing and lot less learning by reading or listening and a lot less memorization.

Cold Victory

The Book Girls recommend Karl Marlantes's Cold Victory (2024). This book features two diplomats (one a Finnish-American, one a Russian) and their wives, posted in Finland. It turns out the two diplomats had met when they were soldiers near the end of World War II (when the US finally sent the USSR the help they'd promised) and they still considered themselves good friends. Their wives get to know each other and eventually also become friends.

Then a bunch of stressful, exciting, tragic stuff happens because of saving face, too much alcohol, and supreme naivete.

This is not the ideal book on Finland because few of the characters were Finnish, but that says a little something in itself about how Finland has to deal with bigger powers.

I never knew Findland's sad WWII history. First Finland was invaded by the USSR, which was an ally of Germany. Germany turned on USSR in 1941, so the Finns joined them to take back the territory they'd lost. They continued to Leningrad. 'Leningrad never fell, and Stalin never forgot.' The US allied with the USSR to fight Germany and drove the Finns back. Afterwards, reparations of 60% of Finland's prewar GDP were imposed (payable in 'hard currency and dismantled industrial plant being shipped to Russia'), but they were still free. (I'd thought people had learned their lesson about reparations after WWI, but I guess not?)

I was intrigued about one character's description of politics: It's all about preventing war. Yes, countries are still jostling for power, but 'You, above all, should know that no matter how dirty politics gets, it's never as dirty as war.'

On dictatorships: The Germans 'weren't all Nazis. … That's the point. Dictatorships need just a few ardent supporters. Democracies need everyone. That's harder to do.' And 'Punishing an innocent man is as effective as punishing a guilty one when the goal is scaring people to keep them in line.'

The Moomins

Tove Jansson's Moomins series was recommended by an ambassador: “The Moomin books were originally written as fairy tales for children. Their philosophic nature is universal and makes the books enjoyable for people of all ages and from all backgrounds. The carefree and friendly Moomins provide a warm-hearted reading experience, and are also an essential part of the childhood of every Finnish kid."

I checked the Central library branch, and they only had Moominvalley in November (The Moomins #8) (1970), the last book in the series.

In this volume, various people who know the Moomins converge on their house as fall sets in, with its rain, wind, and cold. The Moomins are not in, but they make themselves at home. The Moomins' presence is still felt; the characters find comfort here, even with the Moomins gone.

The characters are all different sizes and shapes, and they have different hobbies: cooking and cleaning, playing the harmonica, organizing people, wandering, hiding, imagining things into existence. They don't always get along perfectly, but they try. Often characters fear that the others don't like them or are angry with them. Some have downright suicidal fantasies. And yet sometimes other characters know their secrets and still accept them. And they never try to change each other, except in an effort to respect that other people shouldn't have to change.

' "So this is how it feels," he thought. "This is what sailing is like. The world turns upside down and you hang on for dear life to the edge of the yawning abyss, you freeze and feel ashamed and when it's too late you wish you'd never come. Let's hope and pray he doesn't notice how scared I am." '

It's in the fantasy genre, not my favorite, and the characters have silly, sometimes dangerous adventures, also not really my thing.

A lot of reviewers were disappointed in the book because there were no Moomins and they found it depressing. It turned out the author's mother had recently died, and that spilled over into the book. It feels to me like she was trying to teach us and herself how to go on without someone we love and how we can still benefit from the parts of them that we love.

Still, it turned out the first book in the series was at my local branch, so I read that one, too, Comet in Moominland (Moomins #1) (1946). Two friends go on an adventure and then run home to prepare for an upcoming disaster. Along the way, they meet and help other interesting characters.

A lot of irrational stuff drove me nutso, so that will be my last Moomin book. It's too bad: the author is also the illustrator and I just love her line drawings. I like holding the paperbacks in my hands and looking at the pictures. But they are not for me.

After the first full-length book was published, a theatrical version followed. There is a related comic strip. And TV series with puppets. And an animated series (Japan). And a museum exhibit. And a theme park. And a song collection. And décor for the Finnair planes. And a Finnish coin. It got popular throughout Europe, but not the US.

Finland

I wasn't able to find a book in my favorite children's series on different countries, but I did find Alicia Z. Klepeis's Finland (Country Profiles) (2023) for a younger audience.

I learned that Finland is "the land of a thousand lakes," though really they have around 188,000. And wolverines scavenge in the Arctic Circle. And reindeer graze on lichen and berries in the tundra (how do they find enough food?).

Finns are big coffee drinkers (20 lbs/year/person; 2 coffee breaks/day are required for workers). They have many kinds of porridge. Most city dwellers live in apartments; houses in the country are usually wooden. Many homes and even some employers have saunas. Finns invented saunas as well as ice skates, the rescue toboggan, the first wireless heart rate monitor, and "Angry Birds."

Rare Exports

I should also mention that a friend showed a bunch of us the movie "Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale" (2010). I barely remember it now; it's a suspense horror movie where something horrible has been unearthed, and the one to figure out the problem first is a kid who must get the adults to understand.

Profile

llcoolvad: (Default)
llcoolvad

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 27th, 2026 01:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios